The Populist Paradox
Keywords:
Populist Paradox, Macroeconomics, Distributive Conflict, Economic Theory, ArgentineAbstract
While economic theory indicates that macroeconomic populism is doomed to failure, history shows that populist experiences are frequently repeated, ignoring both theory and past failures. In this article, we explore the origin of this paradox: why a strategy that is considered inconsistent and, therefore, doomed to failure, is adopted by governments? The “populist paradox” represents a challenge to general equilibrium frameworks based on purely rational behavior. Our explanation is that there are situations in which governments face a strong tension between two policy objectives: macroeconomic balance and social peace. This type of situation can be analytically characterized as a case of structural disequilibrium that occurs when there is a structural distributive conflict: a tension between social demands and the productive capacity of the economy. The economic policy strategies that prefers the objective of social peace over macroeconomic balance are what the literature calls “populist”. The repeated implementation of this type of strategies arises from the social pressure to satisfy popular demands. To illustrate and give historical background to our hypothesis, we use the Argentine economic history. As a solution to this type of conflicts, we offer some guidelines of a tentative strategy based on a social agreement that includes the possibility of trading income for equity between labor and capital.
Downloads
References
Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G. y Sonin, K. (2013). A Political Theory of Populism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2), 771-805.
Blanchard, O. (2017). Macroeconomics. United States: Pearson.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (ed.) (1991). Populismo Econômico. São Paulo: Nobel.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2008). The Dutch disease and its neutralization: a Ricardian approach. Brazilian Journal
of Political Economy, 28(1), 47-71.
Canitrot, A. (1975). La experiencia populista de redistribución de ingresos. Desarrollo Económico, 15(59), pp.
-351.
Casullo, M. E. (2014). ¿En el nombre del pueblo? Por qué estudiar el populismo hoy. Revista PostData, 19(2),
-313.
Di Tella, G. (10 de julio de 1980). Paradojas de la política económica. Criterio, 53.
Di Tella, T. (1965). Populismo y reforma en América Latina”; Desarrollo Económico, 4(16), pp. 391-425.
Di Tella, R. and Dubra, J. (2010). Peronist Beliefs and Interventionist Policies. NBER Working Papers, 16621.
Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/papers/w16621.pdf
Dockendorǂ , A. y Kaiser, V. (2009). Populismo en América Latina. Una revisión de la literatura y la agenda.
Revista austral de ciencias sociales, 17, 75-99.
Dornbusch, R. (1996). Latin Triangle. Boston, MIT (mimeo). Recuperado de
http://web.mit.edu/15.018/attach/Dornbusch,%20R.%20Latin%20triangle.pdf
Dornbusch, R. y Edwards, S. (eds.) (1991). The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press.
Kaufman, R. R. y Stallings B. (1991). The Political Economy of Latin American Populism.In Dornbusch, R. and
Edwards, S. (eds.), The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America (pp. 15-43). Chicago: University of
Chicago Press. Recuperado de https://www.nber.org/chapters/c8296.pdf
Katz, S. and Rozenwurcel, G. (2014). Instituciones, desempeño económico y regímenes de política. Desarrollo
Económico: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 405-415.
Eco, U. (1989). El péndulo de Foucault. Buenos Aires: Lumen-De la Flor.
Edwards, S. (2019). On Latin American Populism, and Its Echoes around the World. Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 33(4), 76–99.
Genicot, G. y Ray, D. (2019). Aspirations: A Review. EDI Working Papers Series. Recuperado de
https://edi.opml.co.uk/research/aspirations-economics-review/
Gerchunoǂ , P. y Llach, L. (2004). Entre la equidad y el crecimiento: ascenso y caída de la economía argentina,
-2002. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
Gerchunoǂ , P. y Rapetti, M. (2016). La economía argentina y su confl icto distributivo estructural (1930-2015).
El Trimestre Económico, LXXXIII(2) (330), 225-272.
Germani, G. (1978). Autoritarismo, fascismo y populismo nacional. Buenos Aires: Temas.
Hawkins, K. y Ruth-Lovell, S. (2017). Populism and democratic representation in Latin America. In Holtz-Bacha,
C., Mazzoleni, O. y Heinisch, R. (eds.), Political Populism: A Handbook (pp. 255-273). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Laclau, E. (2005). La razón populista. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Malamud, C. (2010). Populismos Latinoamericanos. Los tópicos de ayer, de hoy y de siempre. Oviedo: Ediciones Nobel.
Murillo, M. V. (2018). La historicidad del pueblo y los límites del populismo. Nueva Sociedad, 274, 165-175.
Ocampo, E. (2019). The Economic Analysis of Populism: A Selective Review of Literature; Documento de
Trabajo N° 694; Universidad del CEMA; mayo.
Olivera, J. (1991). Equilibrio social, equilibrio de mercado e infl ación estructural. Desarrollo Económico,
(120), pp. 487-193.
Panizza, F. (comp.) (2009). El populismo como espejo de la democracia. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura
Económica.
Ray, D. (2006). Aspirations, poverty, and economic change. In Banerjee, A. V., Bénabou, R. and
Mookherjee, D. (eds.), Understanding poverty (pp. 409-421). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:
1093/0195305191.003.0028
Rodrik, D. (2018). Is Populism Necessarily Bad Economics?. AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic
Association, 108, 196-199.
Sachs, J. (1989). Social Confl ict and Populist Policies in Latin America. NBER Working Papers, 2897.
Sowter, L. (2013). La legitimidad de la intervención estatal y del modelo de desarrollo en la Argentina peronista: Estado, empresarios y trabajadores en los consejos y comisiones para la cooperación económica (1943-1955) (Tesis
inédita de doctorado). Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Recuperado de
https://repositorio.fl acsoandes.edu.ec/handle/10469/5605
Weyland, K. (1999). Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 31(4),
-401.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Desarrollo Económico. Revista de Ciencias Sociales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house, and the non-exclusive transmission of the author´s patrimonial rights in favor of the editor, who allows the post-print version use, under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.
It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.
The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.
