¿Hay aquí una paradoja? Recurrencia y funcionalidad del populismo en Argentina

Comentario al artículo de Gerchunoff, Rapetti y de León, “La Paradoja populista”

Authors

  • Alejandro Bonvecchi Universidad Torcuato Di Tella-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
  • Marcos Novaro Universidad de Buenos Aires-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)

Keywords:

Argentina, Populism, Economic Policy, Distributive Conflict

Abstract

This commentary on the piece by Gerchunoff, Rapetti and de León discusses the main assumptions underpinning their conceptualization of economic populism, and the consequences of those assumptions for their analysis of populism in Argentina. It argues that those assumptions are untenable, insofar as they omit consideration of sociological, political, and political economy issues already established, both theoretically and empirically, in the literature. It also criticizes the analysis of populism for setting aside precisely some of those issues that, according to the evidence available in the literature, have also been established as central.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-01-12

How to Cite

Bonvecchi, A. ., & Novaro, M. . (2021). ¿Hay aquí una paradoja? Recurrencia y funcionalidad del populismo en Argentina: Comentario al artículo de Gerchunoff, Rapetti y de León, “La Paradoja populista”. Desarrollo Económico. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 60(231), 228–239. Retrieved from https://revistas.ides.org.ar/desarrollo-economico/article/view/75

Issue

Section

Discussion