TECHNOLOGY, PRODUCTION STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT
A STUDY BASED ON NETWORK AND COMMUNITY ANALYSIS
Keywords:
Economic development, Productive structure, Manufacture, ServicesAbstract
The manufacturing industry was traditionally considered the “modernizing” sector of the economy. However, with the growth of knowledge-intensive services and the resource-based development experiences, its role has been questioned. The article aims to identify and characterize the relationship between the income level of the countries and their productive structure, with a particular focus on manufacturing activities. A network analysis method was used to analyze a database of 57 countries at a level of 34 industries. We identified “communities” of countries grouped by the level of similarity of their productive structures. Here, we observed a strong correlation between the income level and the productive structure of countries. Then, building upon a sectoral taxonomy based the technological intensity of activities we found that high income countries, despite having undergo- ne a deindustrialization process, maintained a productive and commercial specialization –as well as in their research and development activities– in knowledge-intensive manufacturing activities. By contrast, countries with lower income levels –particularly middle-income economies–, experienced a process of deindustrialization with a relative specialization in less knowledge- intensive activities.
Downloads
References
AGÉNOR, P.-R. y CANUTO, O. (2015). “Middle-income growth traps”, Research in Economics, vol. 69, N° 4, pp. 641-660.
AMSDEN, A. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
ANDERSEN, A. D. (2012). “Towards a new approach to natural resources and development: the role of learning, innovation and linkage dynamics”, International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, vol. 5, N° 3, pp. 291-324.
———; MARÍN, A. y SIMENSEN, E. O. (2018). “Innovation in natural resource-based industries: a pathway to development?”, Innovation and Development, vol. 8, N° 1, pp. 1-27. Disponible en <10.1080/215793 0x.2018.1439293>.
ARCHIBUGI, D. y MICHIE, J. (1995). “The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 19, N° 1, pp. 121-140.
BRESCHI, S.; MALERBA, F. y ORSENIGO, L. (2000). “Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation”, The Economic Journal, vol. 110, N° 463, pp. 388-410.
CASTELLACCI, F. (2008). “Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation”, Research Policy, vol. 37, N° 6, pp. 978-994.
COE, N.; DICKEN, P. y HESS, M. (2008). “Global production networks: realizing the potential”, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 8, pp. 271-295.
COE, N. M. y YEUNG, H. W. (2015). Global production networks: Theorizing economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DANTAS, E. y BELL, M. (2011). “The co-evolution of firmcentered knowledge networks and capabilities in late industrializing countries: the case of Petrobras in the offshore oil innovation system in Brazil”, World Development, vol. 39, N° 9, pp. 1570-1591.
DASGUPTA, S. y SINGH, A. (2007). “Manufacturing, services and premature deindustrialization in developing countries: a Kaldorian analysis”, en Mavrotas, G. y Shorrocks, A. (eds). Advancing development: Core themes in global economics. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 435-454.
DAVID, A. P. y WRIGHT, G. (1997). “Increasing returns and the genesis of American resource abundance”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 6, N° 2, pp. 203-245.
DE VRIES, G.; TIMMER, M. y DE VRIES, K. (2014). Patterns of structural change in developing countries. N° GD-149. Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
DOSI, G. (1982). “Technological paradigms and techno- logical trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change”, Research Policy, vol. 11, pp. 147-162.
——— (1988). “Institutions and markets in a dynamic world”, The Manchester School, vol. 56, N° 2, pp. 119-146.
FREEMAN, C.; CLARK, J. y SOETE, L. (1982). Unemployment and technical innovation: a study of long waves and economic development. Londres: Burns & Oates.
FREEMAN, C. y LOUçÃ, F. (2001). As time goes by: from the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GEREFFI, G. (2005). “The global economy: organization, governance, and development”, en Smelser, J. y Swedberg, R. (eds.), The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press y Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 160-182.
GEROSKI, P. A. (1991). Market dynamics and entry. Oxford: Blackwell.
GGDC (2017). Groningen Growth and Development Centre. Consultado en marzo de 2017: .
GILL, I. S. y KHARAS, H. (2015). “The middle-income trap turns ten”. Policy Research Working Paper, N° WPS7403, The World Bank.
GYLFASON, T.; HERBERTSSON, T. T. y ZOEGA, G. (1999). “A mixed blessing”, Macroeconomic Dynamics, vol. 3, N° 2, pp. 204-225.
HATZICHRONOGLOU, T. (1997). “Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification”. OEcd Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, N° 1997/02, París. Disponible en .
HERRENDORF, B.; ROGERSON, R. y VALENTINYI, A. (2014). “Growth and structural transformation”, Handbook of economic growth, vol. 2, Elsevier, pp. 855-941.
IIZUKA, M. y KATZ, J. (2010). “Natural resource industries, ‘tragedy of the commons’ and the case of Chilean salmon farming”. Disponible en .
INKLAAR, R. y TIMMER, M. P. (2014). “The relative price of services”, Review of Income and Wealth, vol. 60, N° 4, pp. 727-746.
KALDOR, N. (1967). Strategic factors in economic development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
KATZ, J. (2017). “The Latin American Transition from an Inward-Oriented Industrialisation Strategy to a Natural Resource-Based Model of Economic Growth”, Institutions and Economies, pp. 9-22.
——— y STUMPO, G. (2001). “Sectoral regimes, productivity and international competitiveness”, cEPAL Review, vol. 75, Santiago de Chile.
LALL, S.; WEISS, J. y ZHANG, J. (2006). “The ‘sophistication’ of exports: a new trade measure”, World Development, vol. 34, N° 2, pp. 222-237.
LANGE, G.-M.; WODON, Q. y CAREY, K. (2018). The changing wealth of nations 2018: Building a sustainable future, The World Bank.
LAVOPA, A. M. (2015). “Structural transformation and economic development: can development traps be avoided?”, tesis de doctorado. Maastricht: Maastricht University.
LEE, K. (2013). Schumpeterian analysis of economic catch-up: Knowledge, path-creation, and the middleincome trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MALERBA, F. (2002). “Sectoral systems of innovation and production”, Research Policy, vol. 31, N° 2, pp. 247-264.
——— (2005). “Sectoral systems. How and why inno- vation differs accross sectors”, en Fagerberg, J.; Mowery, D. C. y Nelson, R. R. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 380-406.
——— y ORSENIGO, L. (1997). “Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 6, N° 1, pp. 83-118.
MARÍN, A.; NAVAS-ALEMÁN, L. y PÉREZ, C. (2015). “Natural Resource Industries As a Platform for the Development of Knowledge Intensive Industries”, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, n/a-n/a. Disponible en: <10.1111/tesg.12136>.
MARÍN, A. y STUBRIN, L. (2015). “Innovation in natural resources: New opportunities and new challenges. The case of the Argentinian seed industry”, Working Papers Series, 2015-015, UNU-MERIT.
——— y DA SILVA JR., J. J. (2015). “KIBS Associated to Natural Resources Based Industries. Seeds Innovation and Regional Providers of the Tech- nology Services Embodied in Seeds in Argentina and Brazil, 2000-2014”, IAdB-Discussion Paper, Nº IDB-DP-375.
MARSILI, O. y VERSPAGEN, B. (2002). Technology and the dynamics of industrial structures: an empirical mapping of Dutch manufacturing”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 11, N° 4, pp. 791-815.
MIOZZO, M. y SOETE, L. (2001). “Internationalization of services: a technological perspective”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 67, N° 2, pp. 159-185.
PALAN, N. y SCHMIEDEBERG, C. (2010). “Structural convergence of European countries”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 21, N° 2, pp. 85-100. Disponible en .
PAVITT, K. (1984). “Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory”, Research Policy, vol. 13, N° 6, pp. 343-373.
PÉREZ, C. (2010a). “Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, N° 1, pp. 185-202.
——— (2010b). “Technological dynamism and social inclusion in Latin America: a resource-based production development strategy”, EcLAc Review, vol. 100, pp. 121-141.
RODRIK, D. (2016). “Premature deindustrialization”, Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 21, N° 1, pp. 1-33.
SMITH, K. (2007). Innovation and growth in resource-based economies. Tasmania: University of Tasmania.
SZIRMAI, A. (2012). “Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950-2005”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 23, N° 4, pp. 406-420. Disponible en .
UNCTAD (2016). Trade and Development Report, 2016. Nueva York y Ginebra: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
VILLE, S. y WICKEN, O. (2012). “The dynamics of resource-based economic development: evidence from Australia and Norway”. Industrial and Corporate Change, pp. 1-31.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house, and the non-exclusive transmission of the author´s patrimonial rights in favor of the editor, who allows the post-print version use, under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.
It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.
The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.
